<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putt-Putt trailhead targeted for development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jhunderground.com/2008/10/30/putt-putt-trailhead-targeted-for-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jhunderground.com/2008/10/30/putt-putt-trailhead-targeted-for-development/</link>
	<description>news, sports and music blog from Jackson Hole, Wyoming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.jhunderground.com/2008/10/30/putt-putt-trailhead-targeted-for-development/comment-page-1/#comment-66165</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jhunderground.com/?p=1179#comment-66165</guid>
		<description>We do need housing,but let the Forest Service do it on their N. Cache property. The Bush hungover F.S.wants to sell it to finance the Putt Putt housing? Sure, the land  there is worth a gazillion bucks, but what will replace it? Oh boy, more retail and office space that Jackson already has a serious glut of? More development on The North Cache corridor will mean more traffic, more employees we dont have,and more infrastructure that we&#039;ll have to pay for. The F.S. sales and land swaps going on are usually only a good deal for the developers and lots of them stink of good ol&#039; boy backroom deals.The taxpayers and community get hosed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do need housing,but let the Forest Service do it on their N. Cache property. The Bush hungover F.S.wants to sell it to finance the Putt Putt housing? Sure, the land  there is worth a gazillion bucks, but what will replace it? Oh boy, more retail and office space that Jackson already has a serious glut of? More development on The North Cache corridor will mean more traffic, more employees we dont have,and more infrastructure that we&#8217;ll have to pay for. The F.S. sales and land swaps going on are usually only a good deal for the developers and lots of them stink of good ol&#8217; boy backroom deals.The taxpayers and community get hosed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js</title>
		<link>http://www.jhunderground.com/2008/10/30/putt-putt-trailhead-targeted-for-development/comment-page-1/#comment-37049</link>
		<dc:creator>js</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jhunderground.com/?p=1179#comment-37049</guid>
		<description>Our public lands are one of the most egalitarian ideals we have in America. There are some principles you can&#039;t let be eroded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our public lands are one of the most egalitarian ideals we have in America. There are some principles you can&#8217;t let be eroded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skiing the backcountry</title>
		<link>http://www.jhunderground.com/2008/10/30/putt-putt-trailhead-targeted-for-development/comment-page-1/#comment-36399</link>
		<dc:creator>skiing the backcountry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jhunderground.com/?p=1179#comment-36399</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely a touchy subject. We need housing in jackson, but at what costs? I would rather see them build up a story or tow than expand out. But obviously ideally, i wouldn&#039;t have either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely a touchy subject. We need housing in jackson, but at what costs? I would rather see them build up a story or tow than expand out. But obviously ideally, i wouldn&#8217;t have either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
