By Jim Stanford on January 14, 2009
Today the News&Guide has a front-page story about local blogs and our coverage of last month’s avalanches at Jackson Hole Mountain Resort.
Basically, the story asserts that while blogs may have been fast in “shooting from the hip,” the most accurate and reliable source of news remains, of course, the good old-fashioned paper you can hold in your hands — a point that would have been more convincing were it not for a few typos and editing bloopers.
David Gonzalez of The Snazz has a pretty witty retort. As the old joke goes, at least they spelled my name right.
The fact is, while the paper may claim some sort of high ground for careful, deliberative reporting and editing, reporters and editors often make mistakes because they are rushing to meet deadlines — arbitrary time constraints dictated by the need to feed a printing press. The newsroom can be a pressure cooker.
That’s why I’m usually reluctant to criticize the work of my friends in the print media. After all, I worked at the newspaper for nearly 10 years and know well how much commitment and idealism journalists bring to the task.
Print journalists everywhere are struggling with the Internet in general and blogs in particular. Like Buzz Bissinger. And The Washington Post.
I grew up with newspapers and understand the need for a “paper of record,” but also recognize that they must be challenged to maintain the highest standards. (Susan Estrich recently wrote a great piece, printed in the Jackson Hole Daily, explaining why blogs are dependent on newspapers.)
•
Today, I do have a bone to pick with the News&Guide, and it’s not over the blog story. It’s about the letter to the editor written by an anonymous Teton County Search and Rescue volunteer stabbing ex-team member Steve Romeo in the back.
Romeo is the blogger Rando Steve of Teton AT recently dismissed from Search and Rescue for posting photos of the Headwall avalanche. The letter is a vicious personal attack calling into question Romeo’s motives for writing:
“I never saw the images and writing that got you fired. I refuse to visit your site (in fact, I will not mention it in the press) due to my supreme disapproval of what you do. You are an experienced and skilled mountaineer and skier, but your egotistical approach and sell-it-all attitude compromises everyone who ventures into the mountains for self-fulfillment, instead of ego and greed.”
This person needs their own blog! Full text of the letter appears below.
The letter writer makes some valid points, but if you are going to attack someone in this manner, at least have the guts to sign your name. Even more cowardly was the newspaper’s decision to print an anonymous missive despite a strict policy stating all letters must be signed.
For the paper to publish a gratuitous swipe at a blogger in an issue in which it attempts to criticize blogging for relying on unnamed sources is bewildering. Forget the typos; bending a core principle to drum up letters is by far the most embarrassing mistake.
According to the News&Guide, the following letter was addressed to Steve Romeo, former member of Teton County Search and Rescue:
Sell it all
I am writing anonymously to protect my position as a search and rescue member. First off, thanks for your time as a member of the team. I am appalled you were fired. You were one of the strongest and most competent members of the team, and [Sheriff Bob] Zimmer asking you to step down shows how little he understands the team’s internal function.
It shows he would rather have power over us than have the strongest team possible.
In your apology to the team, you claim to have let your teammates down. The truth is the opposite, you were valuable in any situation. It is not Zimmer and search and rescue you have let down, but rather the whole community. In making money by exposing the things the whole community loves, you have violated something that is precious and cannot defend itself. Worse than that, you have been doing this since you started your Web site.
I never saw the images and writing that got you fired. I refuse to visit your site (in fact, I will not mention it in the press) due to my supreme disapproval of what you do. You are an experienced and skilled mountaineer and skier, but your egotistical approach and sell-it-all attitude compromises everyone who ventures into the mountains for self-fulfillment, instead of ego and greed. Fortunately, it seems there is a point where people will no longer take your exploitation, it is just too bad the solution was kicking you off the team, not shutting your blog down.
Steve, you were a strong, competent and trustworthy team member, and not the first one with strong qualifications to be fired from the team. You behaved unprofessionally and were fired over it. Apparently you were warned, but how professional can Zimmer ask volunteers to be? In my time with the team, there has been very little talk about compensation for the long and unpredictable hours we spend helping others, and a great deal of talk regarding behaving in a professional manner. Perhaps our next sheriff will address this issue.
Finally, to the whole community: I understand Steve posted pictures and text some residents found inflammatory. He used poor judgment in what he posted. In my experience, this has always been the case. I am sure his headwall coverage was no worse than the daily spay he publishes. Please join me in boycotting his Web site until he stops selling the places we love.
Name withheld by request
Jackson Hole
Posted under Media














To “Name withheld by request,”
Steve Romeo did nothing wrong. Here in America, Steve is allowed to say what he wants when he wants, just as you are in your letter to the editor. And doesn’t that feel great?–to say what you want? That’s living in a free society. I don’t like what you say in your letter, but I rather hear your side than not hear it at all because I benefit from hearing your opinion, just as I benefit from reading a Rando Steve Trip Report.
Sam Petri
This blog vs print discussion is both divisive and necessary.
The paradigm is changing: those in the ‘old’ medium are defensive, those in the ‘new’ are experimenting as they participate in the evolution (sometimes, REvolution).
Recognize the big picture of what is happening. The main point is that journalism will always have a role. It is an essential institution in the free world. What will always be in shortest supply is quality reporting – validity, use of the language. Which medium conveys it doesn’t really matter…and the choices (newsprint, airwaves, internet) will always be changing.
Now plunge in and duke it out!!
In this recent snow season, the blogs have the advantage of immediacy – almost instant access to the community. And just because they have immediacy doesn’t mean that quality suffers. With fewer checks & balances – maybe sometimes. But checks & balances in the print media don’t always prevent errors. I could go on.
But each medium and outlet can have a role. The challenge is – they have to define it and evolve it as time goes on.
I find the valley blogs to provide 2 things uniquely: an individual point of view (of the blogger), and an interactive community discussion of what just happened, real time. On the subject of mountaineering, there are currently no more expert voices than on the blogs.
For me, the more-established print media provide a collective, perhaps more institutionalized insight, with a broader view of valley issues over time…continuity. They have a longer time line – perhaps. But they now also have evolving e-versions, that challenge them to think about how they themselves want to evolve, not as contrained by printing presses.
The Wall Street Journal just merged its print and web newsrooms. Interesting….
Back to Steve Romeo, David Gonzalez, Jim Stanford, and others. You are like editorial columnists, but so much more. The viability of your blogs depends on how well you cover your chosen areas, but the community wants you and needs you (is thirsty for you!) to continue on your path.
Who said we had to choose?
Karen
It is frightening that the N&G letter writer argues in favor of having “someone” shut down the blog alltogether. I prefer to live in a country where all sorts of blogs are allowed rather than one in which any blog found offensive by anyone can be forcefully and legally removed.
If a law was broken, it is one thing, but as I understand it, it was organizational/corporate policies that were infringed upon.
A multiplicity of views and opinions must be read to understand an issue and all its players. Apparently that is not the case here.
Hey ‘Name withheld’
get over it. You were not the last skier to move to the Valley, nor was I. Steves ‘letting out of secrets’ is while indeed sometimes lamentable, your anonymous diatribe against him is a worse infringement in this small town. While you may think he let all the cats out of the bag, he is only showing images of ‘relativley’ well known lines, lines published in print many times over. Published long before TetonAT.
Either state your NAME and state your case or shut up.
thumbs down to the NaG for publishing a letter that is in such poor taste and style!
WOW TO: Name with withheld. You are a jealous sad soul. Steve puts a lot of time into that blog which is Teton AT for all who don’t know. Yes he does make money off it but it is work and he is free to do so. You could say JHMR is wrong because they sell the place we love but that not true either. Its not your place it not mine it is everyone that is American. I have lived every year of my life in Wyoming and would love nothing more then to have this place to my self unfortunately that’s not reality. Steve’s site is a great tool for learning BC routes, safety; hear stories, and an occasional laugh. I have never meet Steve and have no reason to defend him, I do so because in a time where the internet is so popular it is nice to see someone putting information up there that is helpful. Steve thanks for you site and enjoy all your extra time skiing now that you don’t have to worry about the good old boys club that the TCSAR seems to be.
Derek
Thanks for your support.
I have a pretty good idea of who wrote the letter and the comments are not surprising coming from that individual. I’ve heard it all before. I am also saddened that the JHNG felt the need to print such a letter.
Fortunately, the Jackson Hole community will still benefit from having a very skilled TCSAR team (less one skier of course) ready to help them in their time of need. It is a great mix of people young and old, skilled in a variety of disciplines.
I am still in shock that all of this is going on. What ever happened to freedom of speech, a tight ski community, and a little love?
I also cannot believe that the newspaper would print an article about someone getting let go from a volunteer position all over snow and a building. I guess it goes to show that there is no better news in JH. That is pretty sad and pathetic. Then to make matters worse, JHNG prints this anonymous letter. Way to go JHNG, you kicked a community member while they were down.
As for Steve, keep your chin up bro! This is a time when you will find out who your real friends are and who has your back. Your blog presents great information, wonderful pictures, and fuels stoke for getting after it. It is by far one of the best “ski blogs” out there. Keep on keeping it real and “live to ski” not play POLITICS!
Jeramie
Whatever happened to swift, SILENT, and deep?
yes, we’re talking about a news event here but, today, everybody wants to use the internet as a podium to stand up on and say ‘look at me look at me!’.
i was at Bridger that day, i was searching for people in probe lines, digging out furniture to check underneath for burials. it was gut wrenching, the reality of a major avalanche event. never did i think about pulling out my camera and snapping pics. by the time SAR showed up the party was over. no wonder Steve had nothing else to do but take pictures for his website…i didn’t feel it was appropriate to capitalize on my position as an initial responder in order to show the world that i was there. the photo’s he took? they would’ve gotten out, there were others taken. but why did someone who was there to save people feel the need to snap photo’s and publish them? don’t get me wrong, i like the news coming out of the websites around here, i like participating in bringing out the truth. but i am careful(professional?) and respectful about my behavior during public emergencies. was it sooooo important?
Jim, thanks for covering this issue. (Did you happen to catch the What’s News forum yesterday?)
As I follow (and even take part in) this story I am reminded of countless conversations and classes in J-school dedicated to these types of topics; specifically, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and ethically sticky questions of whether or not to publish photographs that some people may not want published or even find damaging or offensive.
I don’t know Steve’s educational or professional background, but from my perspective he’s made sound decisions about what to publish on his blog. That’s not to say he’s made the right decision regarding his commitment to TCSAR. He obviously crossed the line. That said, while he may have broken a particular rule, I don’t believe his decision to publish the avalanche pics was in violation of the intent of why TCSAR has such rules.
As for “Name withheld,” please don’t speak for “the whole community,” because you don’t speak for me and Steve didn’t let me down. I’m sure there are others who agree. I appreciate the service he provides and the work that goes into it, even if he may do it to stroke is own ego a bit.
Rather, you should appreciate the freedom of speech we all have, you included (even if you don’t have spine enough to sign your name to your own writing). I respect your right to write what you want, but its not a good idea to be judgmental of others when you haven’t even bothered to see what it is they do. I won’t be joining you in a boycott of TetonAT or Steve’s “daily spay.” (Though your use of the word–misspellings notwithstanding–makes me wonder if you were the person who took the liberty of “editing” the sticker on Steve’s vehicle. Hmmmm…)
Does anyone put 2 and 2 together and realize that the anonymous letter writer might have declined to sign his name specifically because he wrote immediately following all the uproar about members of the TCSAR speaking to press without authorization?